I found Meister’s argument for humanitarian compassion
particularly insightful and compelling: ”it makes us feel good about feeling
bad, creating the delusion that compassion is its own reward” (73). The idea of a purely psychic level of
compassion complicates the condition of suffering by making it something that
can be co-opted and, in a sense, robs this experience from the person
suffering. The fact that one then feels
good about feeling compassion – some kind of perverse sense of selflessness in
identifying with the victim that is actually entirely selfish – seems to lead
to numerous social problems that fail to disrupt the conditions that create the
suffering.
In this context, humanitarian melodrama and the idea of the
truth commissions are also of interest:
“In revealing the truth about pain, melodramatic performance
thus enacts a partial victory over evil: suffering is redeemed, and the victim
is vindicated in the end. To describe
the work of a truth commission as
falling under a genre of fiction (melodrama)
seems insensitive to the real human pain that is reported. My point is not that the truth about what
happened was (or might as well have been) a falsehood, but rather, that the
narrative through which that truth is told assumes an audience that regards
itself as sensitive to human
suffering in just the way melodramatic fiction does” (63).
I wonder what the consequences are of doing away with
fiction/nonfiction when considering humanitarian melodrama. Readers of melodramatic fiction—these people
who read because they “want to feel
bad about the conditions described but who would be made highly uncomfortable
if the victim were portrayed as blaming them” (63)—are mostly women. However, men seem to be the main audience for
the truth commissions because they make up the majority of powerful legal and
political positions that are the audience. Gender has not been approached in
this chapter, but I wonder what this means for the role of gender in questions
of justice and revolutionary aims, especially since women tend to be victims of
oppressive patriarchal social systems worldwide. Is there any value to thinking about
humanitarian melodrama’s nonfiction male audience or fictional female audience? Does this change the type of sensitivity or
humanitarian compassion that is conceived when looking at it in terms of
gender?
It looks like Sol and I have a similar interest here, so hopefully we can pursue this more in class.
No comments:
Post a Comment